[Psml] Fwd: Re: , Issue 6 (John) HQ Support to local Squadrons

[kayaklady at cfl.rr.com]

Hey John, For Topic Two, I was responding to your comment "Have no 
problem with the C/C having appropriate reimbursements."  This 
clearly, at least to me, does not state reimbursement for any one 
else.  Glad you clarified.

Sorry!

Thanks Frank for updating us on the National Advertising grant from 
the Century Fund.  I had forgotten all about that. I know the Ed Dept 
tried to get a grant two/three years ago from Coast Guard, I think it 
was them, regarding traveling around and doing the Train the trainer 
concept.  Glad to see we are finally going to get the funds for that.

Kristi Anderson


----- Original Message -----
From: John <jshivik at cox.net>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:51 am
Subject: Re: [Psml] Fwd: Re:  , Issue 6 (John) HQ Support to local  
Squadrons
To: kayaklady at cfl.rr.com
Cc: United States Power Squadrons Mailing List <psml at usps.org>

> Kristi,
> 
> Topic one - Fine comments and wholeheartedly agree. Was a Florida 
> resident for many years. Know what you mean. As to National 
> advertising, know a lot was spent on the video America's Boating 
> Challenge (or quiz). Good idea but not able to get to the major 
> markets and prime time. I tried to get the tape on local media 
> channels. No success. Business plan and dollars essential - maybe 
> your thoughts may get some one with experience to help. PSA's just 
> can't make it, as you said. Know funds at National are limited as 
> evidenced by the various initiatives by National to increase the 
> bottom line. The impact on National increases in revenue can and 
> does 
> affect Squadrons who are the prime source of revenue.  Applaud 
> National's initiatives within reason. Don't know how much was 
> influenced from the grass roots level. Politics not withstanding.
> 
> Topic two -  Good comments, as well. Don't think I indicated no 
> reimbursements for anyone. Just need to be judicious in allocation 
> and remember the statements in 2001 and 2002 by National. Do fully 
> support a means of reimbursement. Thoughts are to reimburse the 
> C/C, 
> V/C/C, District Cdrs and Squadron Cdrs - not spouses or 
> significant 
> others. This was a significant item of discussion in 2001 / 2002. 
> If 
> funds are readily available at the District and Squadron level for 
> others to participate and to allow reimbursement, fine. Concern is 
> with the loss of membership and financial status that may 
> significantly impact our method of doing business. Our Squadron 
> has 
> individuals attend the various meetings at their own expense. Only 
> limited reimbursement is allowed to the Cdr or designated 
> representative. No, the others are not wealthy, just dedicated and 
> volunteers. They take their time off and own funds to pay for the 
> accommodations, transportation, meals, displays, etc.  So your 
> comment "So, in essence, you are saying to me, that I am not smart 
> enough to lead a group nor am I capable because my financial 
> situation doesn't allow me to travel to the level being determined 
> by 
> those who have plenty of money running the organization."  is off 
> the 
> wall and never did I suggest it nor question your knowledge, an 
> ability to lead or financial capabilities . I, too, look at it as 
> a 
> volunteer. fund for my own  and spouse's expenses and  am a worker 
> bee, with financial resources  that need to be applied at a 
> personal 
> level among the many demands beyond the USPS.  What are the 
> chances 
> of a Bass Boater becoming C/C?
> 
>         Another Volunteer's thoughts. Hopefully, someone is 
> listening  to what we have discussed. Am really concerned about 
> USPS 
> decline. What other initiatives will turn the Organization around 
> to 
> place USPS (still like to see  United States Sail and Power 
> Squadrons) in a position of family, education and civic service 
> superiority.
>         Regards,
> 
>                 John
> 
>